Employer's Guide to Discrimination: Hiring and Managing Employees with Criminal Records
by NicoleD, Former Moderator
- Created: March 23, 2010, 11:59 pm
- Updated: February 23, 2011, 2:45 pm
There is no federal law that directly prohibits employment discrimination based on a criminal record, but the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and some courts have ruled that discrimination based on a criminal record can be a form of race discrimination, and a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The EEOC states that nationally, some racial groups are convicted in numbers which are disproportionate to other groups, and barring people from employment based on their conviction records will have a disproportionate impact on people of color.
Background Checks and Interviews
Depending on state law, employers may or may not be permitted to ask job applicants/employees about their prior
arrests or convictions. Check with your local EEOC office for the laws in your area.
In some states, such as Wisconsin, an employer may ask if an applicant has any pending charges or convictions, as long as it is clear that the reply will only be considered if the offenses are substantially related to the job. Check your state law to determine the extent to which employers are allowed to ask about or consider criminal records when making adverse employment decisions, such as the refusal to hire or promote employees based on their criminal record.Generally, employers should only ask questions which are relevant to the employment decision. Many states have specifically prohibited or advised against pre-employment inquiries in their fair employment laws due to the possible misuse of this information. Employers can access background checks through their local courts, state repository, or through credit reporting agencies that do criminal background checks.
The EEOC rules that the use of arrest records as an absolute bar to employment has an unequal impact on some protected groups, and as a result, employers cannot exclude applicants based solely on their arrest record. If the charges alleged in the arrest record are related to the job, the employer should evaluate whether the arrest record reflects the applicant's conduct. The EEOC recommends that an employer should offer the applicant or employee an opportunity to explain, and, if he or she denies the charges, make the follow-up inquiries to determine credibility.
According to the EEOC, conviction records are ‘reliable evidence' that a person engaged in the alleged conduct, since the justice system requires the proof beyond a reasonable doubt for a conviction. In contrast, arrests alone are not reliable evidence that a person has actually committed a crime.
It's unlikely that an employer will be able to justify broad general inquiries about an employee's or applicant's arrests. However, employers may exclude employees with criminal records from employment opportunities if a business necessity exists, essentially, if the employee or applicant's conduct indicates unsuitability for the position. A business necessity is commonly cited if the conduct for which the applicant/employee was arrested is job-related and relatively recent.Both states and the federal government have regulations that limit the employment opportunities for some people with criminal records, making it harder (or impossible) to get certain occupation certifications. This exception is common in the healthcare industry, and some others, including jobs that involve working children. In some cases, these restrictions can be appealed if the applicant shows evidence of rehabilitation. For more information on discrimination, see Business.gov's Employment Discrimination and Harassment portal.
Message Edited by NicoleD on 09-17-2009 12:11 PM
Message Edited by ChristineL on 11-30-2009 02:27 PM
Top Rated Articles
About This Blog
Legal terms and rules explained
- December 2013 (6)
- November 2013 (26)
- October 2013 (17)
- September 2013 (24)
- August 2013 (21)
- July 2013 (26)
- June 2013 (24)
- May 2013 (29)
- April 2013 (29)
- March 2013 (27)
- February 2013 (26)
- January 2013 (30)
- December 2012 (24)
- November 2012 (29)
- October 2012 (26)
- September 2012 (29)
- August 2012 (26)
- July 2012 (29)
- June 2012 (25)
- May 2012 (33)
- April 2012 (35)
- March 2012 (36)
- February 2012 (35)
- January 2012 (30)