Search
SBA Franchise loans and defaults
by RyanBridgeMgt, Window Shopper
- Created: May 17, 2012, 10:55 am
- Updated: November 1, 2012, 1:14 pm
It seems I am getting calls more and more frequent from struggling business owners all across the country who are in default with their Franchise Business. Franchises are a popular method for aspiring entrepreneurs to “launch” themselves into business. They come with a proven business model, marketing, operations, training, and a network of other franchise owners who are available to answer questions and provide guidance. Franchises are one of the fastest growing segments of the small business market for a good reason – they work! However, when things don’t go quite right…when revenues drop due to sever competitive pressure, or macro-economic trends crush the business (as is happening across the country), or personal financial resources dry up for whatever reason, leaving the business floundering, a franchise (and the associated franchisor) can become a major roadblock to successfully restructuring the business. Why would it make a difference, you ask? Simple, in a restructuring, ALL the key stakeholders must get on board (or be dragged on board to successfully accomplish a restructuring. Each player at the table – the bank, the business owner, the landlord, and the franchisor – must have their needs addressed. In the case of the franchisor, it is necessary to convince them that it is in their best interest to play ball with the restructuring…since the alternative is much worse. However, in some cases, I’ve found franchisors who PREFER for the franchisee to fail. Here’s why: Franchise agreements typically give the franchisor great control and power over the rights of the franchisee when it comes time to transfer the license to a new owner. In some cases, they can actually prevent it. What happens then? Simple – the franchisor can step in and pick up the franchise agreement and convert the location to a CORPORATE OWNED location. The franchisor can then FLIP the location and make a tidy profit. I only mention this because I’ve seen it done…and it is not pretty. The franchisee who poured their heart and soul into building a great business is wiped out of the equation, and the franchisor steps in, with almost no investment, and takes over the location…only to sell it six months later for a healthy profit. The key point is that when dealing with a franchisor, you have to understand that their interests do not necessarily allign with you, the franchisee. However, if you understand this going in, you can build your restructuring plan so that you can avoid these pitfalls and come out with a clean business, no debt, and possibly a restructured franchise agreement. They key is understanding what rights the franchisor has, and getting an early indication as to their motivations. Feel free to message with any questions. (Please note that Community members may not include personally identifiable information, such as phone numbers, in posts.)

DLA | Performer | 11/9/2012 - 9:56 pm
of their franchisees. That would be bad for business. I believe that overall,
franchises have a better success rate than independent start-ups, but as with
anything else in life you just need to do your homework with regards to any
particular franchises before investing. The FDD has lots of good info about
the success rate other past franchisees.
loanuniverse | Window Shopper | 5/18/2012 - 10:03 pm
"...franchisors who PREFER for the franchisee to fail...". I think that there
is probably some misinterpretation here. You are correct to mention that all
stakeholders should be partners in the venture, but one thing that needs to
be clear is that this is not a partnership of equals. The business owner
represents the equity, and this means that it is usually the first one to get
wiped out. On the other hand, the business owner benefits the most from a
successful business. I mean if the franchise is successful, chances are you
are not going to walk up to your lender, landlord, or franchisor and give
them a couple of thousand dollars more a month to share the wealth.
This means that when the business starts having financial difficulties, the
other stakeholders will move to protect themselves, and this sometimes
happens at the expense of wathever remaining equity the business owner has. I
do not think it is part of an evil plot to sell the franchise to another
buyer in a few months.
Another thing, anybody interested in franchising should do some research on
the failure rates of many well known concepts. I know that the SBA released
loan performance by franchise brand last year. The data reflects loans
approved from 10/01/01 to 09/30/10, which were assigned to a franchise brand
and subsequently disbursed. I bet there are people out there that would be
surprised to find out that some loans to well known sub shop brands fail 34%
of the time.
agleason | Window Shopper | 10/31/2012 - 3:11 pm
Another item to review is how your franchise (should you become a franchisee)
handles new locations. The majority of my clients who have a franchise
business failed as a direct result of incompetent franchise management.
Either the location was clearly unacceptable for the business model, the cost
of build out far exceeded what the franchise originally projected, or in one
case, the franchise marketed a grand opening, but gave the address in all
television ads to the biggest competitor’s location instead of their
franchise store.
I would suggest performing independent due diligence and not simply relying
on the franchise model and projections. Franchises are not specifically out
to harm their franchisees, but as loanuniverse stated, this is not a
partnership of equals.
Join The Discussion
You must be logged in to join the discussion. If you already have an SBA Community account, Log In to join the discussion.
New users, Register for a new account and join the conversation today!